Pipeline shore crossing approaches in Arctic conditions

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 31, 2020
Lesana Kurbonshoeva Ove T. Gudmestad Anatoly B. Zolotukhin

Abstract

The development of the Arctic region will entail the construction of new infrastructure, in particular, subsea pipelines. Considering the lack of actual field practice, ecosystem vulnerability and lack of common Arctic international standards, their development will be a big challenge, in particular, in the shore  crossing zone. The design and construction ofpipelines in the shore crossing area require a special approach that takes into account environmental and technological aspects of development. This work is aimed at analysing and determining environmental and technological factors influencing the design of offshore pipelines in the Arctic coastline. The paper presents theoretical and analytical work and the research isapplied to a specific case study (pipelines from the Leningraskoye field to shore), through engineering calculations. Currently, there are five Arctic projects with shore transition areas for which trenching has been implemented. In order to determine the best shore crossing approach, it is important to consider the following environmental conditions: ice encroachment; ice ridges; shoreline erosion; permafrost thawing. Environmental characteristics should predetermine the choice of approach.
Among three existing methods: trenching, tunnelling and horizontal directional drilling (HDD), the micro-tunnelling method is recommended for the Leningradskoye field in combination with a cofferdam corridor to protect the buried pipe from waves and ice in the nearshore area. In order to protect the surrounded permafrost from melting seasonal cooling-device is recommendedto be used. The burial depth is determined to be more than 3.52 m in accordance with Force model calculations of ice ridges scouring depth. On the basis of research, the general choice-making diagram was proposed for Arctic shore crossing areas.

How to Cite

1.
Kurbonshoeva L, Gudmestad OT, Zolotukhin AB. Pipeline shore crossing approaches in Arctic conditions. PST [Internet]. 2020Mar.31 [cited 2020Jul.8];4(1(3):18-6. Available from: https://pipeline-science.com/index.php/PST/article/view/113

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 4 | PDF file Downloads 6

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

subsea pipelines, Arctic region, pipeline shore crossing, trenching method

References
[1] International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2018 (WEO 2018). [https://www.iea.org/weo2018/ available on 30.03.2019].
[2] Eisler, B. (2016, October 24). Shore Crossing Design Considerations & Solutions for Arctic Subsea Pipelines. OTC-27453-MS. In Proceedings of Arctic Technology Conference held in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, 24-26 October 2016.
[3] Heuer, C.E., Caldwell, J.B. and Zamsky, B., “Design of Buried Seafloor Pipelines for Permafrost Thaw Settlement”, Proceedings of the Fourth International
Conference on Permafrost, Fairbanks, California, Final Report Ice encroachment in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea, April 2012.
[4] Duplenskiy, S., Master’s Thesis University of Stavanger/ Gubkin University Protection of Subsea Pipelines against Ice Ridge Gouging in Conditions of Substantial Surface Ice, 2012.
[5] AO “Roscartography” National Atlas of the Arctic,Chief Editor - Nikolay Kasimov - Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, First Vice-President
of the Russian Geographical Society, 2017.
[6] Jianguang, Y. Methods of Heat Transfer Analysis of Buried Pipes in District Heating and Cooling Systems. Applied Engineering. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2018, pp. 33-38.
[7] Anisimov, O., Reneva, S., Permafrost and Changing Climate: The Russian Perspective. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2006, 35(4):169-175.
[8] Morev Y.A., Mirzoyev F.D., Arkhipova O.L., Ibragimov I.E., Trudov S.V. Technical and Technological Solutions for the Development of Arctic Gas Condensate Fields using the Underwater Complex, GazpromVNIIgaz.
[9] [https://www.znak.com/2017201/vlasti_yanao_obespokoeny_tayaniem_vechnoy_merzloty_kotoraya_negativno_vliyaet_na_stroyki].
[10] Zubakin G.K., Egorov A.G., Ivanov V.V., Lebedev A.A., Buzin I.V., Eide L.I., Formation of the severe ice conditions in the southwest of the Kara Sea». 18th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Canada, 2008.
[11] Prokopenko I.A., Dissertation for the degree, Determination of the optimal construction technology for offshore pipeline crossings at technical and economic criteria, Gubkin University, Moscow 2008.
[12] SR (set of Rules) Kodeks 42-101-2003 General provisions for the design and construction of gas distribution systems of metal and polyethylene pipes
[13] NPO Fundamentstroyarkos LLC. [https://www.nposa.ru/sites/default/files/sistemy_temperaturnoy_stabilizacii_vechnomerzlyh.pdf -available on 26.05.2019].
[14] Gudmestad, O., Loset, S., Alhimenko, A., Shkhinek, K, Torum, A, Jensen, A. Engineering Aspects Related to Arctic Offshore Developments, St. Petersburg, Publisher “LAN” Design, 2007.
Section
Original Work